PokerTracker

Hi, guys! I suggest that you should expand functionality of NoteTraker with additional variables which can be inserted into autonotes. There are only four of them in PT4: {board-flop},{board-turn},{board-river},{cardrange}. I would love to see such things as {actions-sequence} separete for each street (for example, then I could create a fliter for my opponent's actions on paired flops when he flopped top pair or better). Also it would be wonderful to have such variables as {hand value(flop, turn, river)} and {bet sizing in % of pot (flop, turn, river)}. And it would be absolutely perfect if a user could create custom variables (just dreaming:) ).
Should say, that I play heads-up mostly and notes for me are much more important than statistics. So I hope you guys'll take into account my suggestion. Thnx.

Action sequence as a variable is an interesting suggestion - I'll make a note of it. The problem with hand value is that it makes for a very difficult time reading, especially at the table:

Imagine a note:

Bet 75 to 100% of the pot with {Top Pair Second Kicker No Draw, Middle Set, Nut Flush Draw and One Overcard, Nut Flush Draw and Two Overcards, Top Pair Top Kicker (3)}

Bet size might be interesting as well though - I'll make a note of that one too as:

Bet Size with TPTK on Flop as a percentage of the pot {75, 50, 62, 73, 52, 95, 91}

is a bit more reasonable.

kraada wrote:The problem with hand value is that it makes for a very difficult time reading, especially at the table:
Imagine a note:
Bet 75 to 100% of the pot with {Top Pair Second Kicker No Draw, Middle Set, Nut Flush Draw and One Overcard, Nut Flush Draw and Two Overcards, Top Pair Top Kicker (3)}

I think if make descriptions of hands shorter and get rid of the kicker it should be all right:
"bet over 100% pot on [f] with {TP(11), FD(2), MP(3)} "

What do you think?

How do you count overlaps then? If you have TP+FD does it count in two columns, or in one?

kraada wrote:How do you count overlaps then? If you have TP+FD does it count in two columns, or in one?

If it's been possible to realize in PT4 your option: {(TP+FD)(2), (TP+SD)(1), TP(6)} it would be great. But maybe it's too complicated, those situations are really rare, and it will be absolutely OK if it counted in two columns. It's impossible to take into account all the factors which occur in poker. And if it's impossible to achieve the perfection, it's better to keep up simplicity. We should not forget, that PT4 is an auxiliary instrument. The option "count in two columns" will help to determine primary trends in the opponent's game - and this is more than enough.

Still, I'd love to see any kind of the implementation of this feature in PT4.

I understand and I'll make sure the developer in charge of NoteTracker functionality takes a look at this thread. There's definitely good stuff here :)

Karsen wrote:

kraada wrote:The problem with hand value is that it makes for a very difficult time reading, especially at the table:
Imagine a note:
Bet 75 to 100% of the pot with {Top Pair Second Kicker No Draw, Middle Set, Nut Flush Draw and One Overcard, Nut Flush Draw and Two Overcards, Top Pair Top Kicker (3)}

I think if make descriptions of hands shorter and get rid of the kicker it should be all right:
"bet over 100% pot on [f] with {TP(11), FD(2), MP(3)} "

What do you think?

+1 PLEASE! Even the long form would not be a problem for me.